Vaginal Mesh Lawyer Network Statute Alert For 3 Year States

Vaginal Mesh Lawyers Seeking  Pelvic Mesh Implant Victims In 3 Year Statute States

July of 2014 the 3 year statute states reach their “filing a vaginal mesh lawsuit” filing date. That means along with the wome in 1,and 2 year states you will be out of luck after July 2014.

At the Vaginal Mesh Lawyer Network we are advocates for you and your  transvaginal mesh injury. Our lawyers are ready to help women who otherwise would have no voice aginst manufacturers who have chosen profits over your well being. We feel your pain and agony and understand the horrific complications of these Prolene mesh implants. Our vaginal mesh attorneys  have the egal expertise, and offer understanding and compassion. They  believe that each and every women they  represent is truly more then just a lawsuit. These are people and families suffering at the hands of manufacturers they trusted with their lives.   Your justice is our justice, and with the right lawyers  behind  you, you will understand the legal system and vaginal mesh lawsuits.  The  Vaginal Mesh Lawyers are helping  the injured women  first and foremost. Tell us  your deepest fears and concerns about your mesh. the procedure  and well being of your family, the impact  and your desire  for justice. We will explain the mesh MDL to you in language you can understand, and we will protect your rights in this consolidated lawsuit.

You will have the complete confidence you are not alone in your fight for justice against the

Mesh Manufacturers

Pelvic Repair Mesh Multi District Lawsuits Have Been Consolidated Under Judge Goodwin in West Virginia

Trans Vaginal mesh lawsuit MDL – 2325, IN RE: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Pelvic mesh repair mesh lawsuit MDL – 2326 IN RE: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Pelvic mesh repair mesh lawsuit MDL – 2327 IN RE: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Pelvic mesh repair mesh lawsuit MDL – 2387 IN RE: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

Pelvic mesh lawsuit Cook Medical Surgical will be the fifth MDL

Get Your Vaginal Mesh Lawyer Today

Vaginal Mesh Trials Proceed, Vaginal Mesh Lawyers Watch

Vaginal mesh lawyers applaud the recent 2 ml settlement awarded by a  jury  to a woman injured by a Bard vaginal mesh. This is the second bellwether case with very positive results. The jury ruled in favor of plaintiffs Dan and Donna Cisson, who sued Bard over serious, life-changing injuries Donna suffered after she was implanted with the company’s Avaulta vaginal mesh device, meant to address symptoms of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, according to court documents in Cisson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. (MDL-2187; 2:11-cv-00195; U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia). Mr. and Mrs. Cisson were awarded $250,000 in compensatory damages, and $1.75 million in punitive damages. The  first bellwether trial  end in a win for the victim after the jury awarded her $2 million in compensatory and punitive damages for vaginal mesh complications she sustained due to C.R. Bard’s Avaulta Plus pelvic mesh device.

Ethicon Inc.’s Gynecare pelvic mesh products continue to move forward in a multidistrict litigation underway in U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia.  According to a Pretrial Order issued by the Court on August 26, 2013, procedures have been established for the selection of vaginal mesh lawsuits for the litigation’s first bellwether trials involving Gynecare Prolift devices. The first of those trials is scheduled to begin on August 19, 2014. (In re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2327)

Vaginal Mesh Lawyer Network lawyers encourage all women to file their vaginal mesh lawsuit. Although many lawyers have closed their doors to lawsuits from 2 yr statute states, we are still accepting these cases on an individual basis.

States That Are 3, 4 and 5 year statutes include: Arkansas, DC, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming, and Florida.

Texas Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Filed, Vaginal Mesh Lawyers File 1000′s

Vaginal mesh lawyers are filing 1000′s of vaginal mesh lawsuits nationwide and are looking for new information to report of the vaginal mesh lawsuit filings.

A Texas Boston Scientific Mesh Lawsuit Has Been Filed

Buffy Martines recently filed a vaginal mesh lawsuit in Texas against Boston Scientific Corporation for a vaginal sling that caused her more harm than good. This latest vaginal mesh lawsuit was filed on July 2, 2013, but Martines certainly isn’t the first vaginal mesh victim to step forward.

Some manufacturers are trying to deflect responsibility by blaming vaginal mesh problems on the doctors who implant them. According to victims like Martines, however, it’s not necessarily the doctor’s fault.

Vaginal mesh implants are inherently  faulty and 1000′s of women are suffering

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Wins Big, Vaginal Mesh Lawyer Applaud

Donna Cisson, who suffered severe injuries from Bard’s Avaulta Plus Posterior BioSynthetic Support System, was awarded $250,000 in compensatory damages plus $1.75 million in punitive damages. The jury agreed that the mesh’s design was defective and that the manufacturer had failed to warn of the dangers. This is great news and sets the tone for future victories. Get a vaginal mesh lawyer today



Baltimore Vaginal Mesh Lawyers, Vaginal Lawsuits Update

Baltimore  women are filing transvaginal mesh lawsuits against many vaginal mesh manufacturers  for  the  Prolene mesh products. There are currently named in 100′s mesh lawsuits being filed by our Baltimore Vaginal Mesh Lawyer Network

Baltimore  Vaginal Lawyers Filing Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

The Baltimore Vaginal Mesh Lawyer Network vaginal mesh lawyers want all Boston women injured by a vaginal mesh to get justice.

Baltimore Vaginal Mesh Lawyer Update

Vaginal Mesh Multi District Lawsuit List Consolidated Under Judge Goodwin in West Virginia

  • MDL – 2325, IN RE: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
  • MDL No. 2187 | In RE: CR Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
  • MDL – 2326 IN RE: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
  • MDL – 2327 IN RE: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
  • MDL – 2387 IN RE: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation
  • Cook Medical Surgical will be the 5th MDL

Baltimore Vaginal Mesh Lawyer Alert

It is now important  to obtain the vaginal mesh  samples removed  from your  medical facility that currently has them and  maintain them to keep their integrity, according to recent vaginal mesh lawsuit  court documents


Vaginal Mesh Lawyers Announce Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Update

Vaginal Mesh Lawyer Network keeps you updated on all the latest news regarding the vaginal mesh trials. There has been a new vaginal mesh lawsuit order in the Federal Ethicon Transvaginal Mesh lawsuits. Vaginal mesh lawyers of Vaginal Mesh Lawyer Network continue to file vaginal mesh lawsuits in the  West Virginia MDL’s  for the manufacturs  by Ethicon Inc., American Medical Systems, Inc., Boston Scientific Corp., and C.R. Bard. Inc.

 Updated Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit News

In the Vaginal mesh lawsuit in the MDL In re: Ethicon, Inc. Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2327  against  Ethicon, Inc. , the parties have agreed to a stipulation regarding subpoenas issued to third parties for the production of documents. This is a very important step as this Order will help ensure that plaintiffs in vaginal mesh lawsuits have access to documents that are relevant  to their claims.

Vaginal Mesh Lawyer Lawsuits

American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2325;

Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2326; and

C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2187. B




American Medical Systems Vaginal Mesh Lawyers

Vaginal Mesh Lawyer Network, American Medical Systems vaginal mesh lawyers are filing lawsuits pending the next scheduled trial which will begin in December 2013 against American Medical Systems, Inc. (MDL No. 2325) In re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (MDL-2325).

American Medical Systems Products

AMS MiniArc Precise Single-Incision Sling

AMS MiniArc Single Incision Sling

AMS Monarc Subfascial Hammock

AMS In-Fast Ultra Transvaginal Sling

AMS BioArc

AMS Sparc Self-Fixating Sling System

AMS Elevate

AMS Perigree

AMS Apogee

Any woman having complications with one of these Prolene mesh products is advised to see a Urogynecologist and speak to a Vaginal Mesh Lawyer Network, AMS vaginal mesh lawyer

Bard Vaginal Mesh Lawyers Filing Bard Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Judge Refused to Dismiss Punitive Damage Claims in C.R. Bard Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Judge R. Goodwin, overseeing thousands of vaginal mesh lawsuit claims in U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia, has refused to dismiss punitive damage claims in four bellwether cases in the C.R. Bard vaginal mesh litigation, In re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2187.  Filing a June 4th motion attorneys for C.R. Bard moved to dismiss these claims, due to the fact it had provided a warning in the instructions for use provided with its Avaulta Transvaginal mesh products. Judge Joseph R. Goodwin disagreed, denying the motion because, “simply including such a warning with a product does not absolve the manufacturer of potential punitive damage liability.”

Bard Vaginal Mesh Products

Bard Pelvitex

Bard Pelvisoft

Bard Pelvilace or Pelvicol

Bard Utrtex

Bard Uretex TO

Bard Uretex TOO2

Bard Uretex TOO3


Avaulta Plus™

Avaulta Solo™

BioSynthetic Support System

Faslata® Allograft

Synthetic Support System



Women are advised to speak to a  Vaginal Mesh Lawyer Network, Bard vaginal mesh lawyer if they have complications from one of the Bard products and to see a Urogynecologist immediately.









Baltimore Vaginal Mesh Lawyers Filing Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits In Consolidated Multi District Vaginal Lawsuits In West Virginia

The Vaginal Mesh Lawyer Network Of Maryland vaginal mesh lawyers  are filing Baltimore vaginal mesh lawsuits as a part of a consolidated multi district vaginal mesh lawsuit.

MDL – 2325, IN RE: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL – 2326 IN RE: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL – 2327 IN RE: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL – 2387 IN RE: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

Vaginal mesh lawyers hope to bring justice to thousands of Baltimore mesh victims who have suffered sever complications from the Prolene mesh implants.

Complications include:

  • Erosion of the mesh thru the vaginal wall
  • Constant infections
  • Severe relentless pain
  • Inability to have intimacy
  • Lower back pain
  • Gastro intestinal pain
  • Bleeding from vagina or rectum
  • Severing and/ or perforation or organs
  • Depression and loss of quality of life

Call Vaginal Mesh Lawyer Network Maryland and speak to a Baltimore vaginal mesh lawyer.


Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Checklist, Vaginal Mesh Lawyers

Below you will see a list of criteria a vaginal mesh lawyer may use in deciding whether  or not to accept your vaginal mesh lawsuit case. These are facts you should have ready to discuss even on the phone. It may bypass the acceptance and later rejection of your case. Remember for these types of lawsuits a local lawyer is not important. Many lawyers have very different criteria.

Have you or a loved had  vaginal mesh implant surgery and:

  • Revision surgery is or was required
  • Revision surgery was needed
  • Mesh removal is scheduled
  • Removal of the mesh
  • Complications in the original implantation
  • State of implantation for statute of limitations issues
  • Date of implantation
  • Type of mesh to see if it is part of the MDL  consolidations
  • Doctor negligence with implantation
  • Year of Implantation
  • Date of mesh removal
  • Name of Manufacturer
  • Type of mesh and reason for implantation
  • Loss of sexual enjoyment, partner may sue as well
  • Vaginal mesh, not hernia mesh
  • Implantation thru the vagina or abdomen
  • Infection after implantation
  • Hysterectomy and implantation
  • More then one mesh implantation for various medical issues
  • Bladder prolapse mesh
  • Bowel prolapse mesh
  • Uterine prolapse mesh
  • Bladder sling mesh
  • Erosion of the mesh into the vagina
  • Mesh extrusion
  • Urinary problems
  • Pelvic Pain
  • Lower back pain
  • Vaginal Pain
  • Hardening of the vaginal mesh
  • Injury to nearby organs
  • Organ Perforation
  • Recurrence of organ prolapse
  • Recurrence of urinary incontinence
  • Difficulty during sex after vaginal surgery
  • Bowel,bladder,& blood vessel perforation
  • Retained by a lawyer who rejected your case
  • Death of a loved one
  • Your age and history of problems
  • No symptoms or injuries

First Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Trial Victory, Vaginal Mesh Lawyers are Ready

The vaginal mesh lawsuits are progressing with a big landfall win for the vaginal mesh lawyers. Vaginal Mesh Lawyers, a nationwide group of concerned mesh lawsuit lawyers are moving forward with filing lawsuits on the news.

NJ jury awards woman $3.35 million in first J&J vaginal mesh verdict

POSTED: Tuesday, February 26, 2013, 6:51 AM

David Sell

An Atlantic City jury awarded a former nurse $3.35 million for what the woman said were years of severe and chronic pain despite 18 unsuccessful repair surgeries meant to fix a vaginal mesh implant made by Johnson & Johnson.

Read that again: 18 unsuccessful repair surgeries.

The Associated Press’ Linda Johnson wrote that this was the first verdict in about 4,000 lawsuits against J&J, which is based in New Brunswick and has multiple operations around Philadelphia. Thirty-plus companies make or made the implants, which are used to lift sagging pelvic organs back into place.

The rest of the AP story is here:

The state Superior Court jury in Atlantic City awarded the compensatory damages to Linda Gross, 47, of Watertown, S.D. Her attorney said pain and other complications caused by the implant forced the former hospital hospice nurse to stop working shortly after her surgery in 2006.

The trial is to begin a second phase on Tuesday, in which the jury will consider whether to also award punitive damages. Under New Jersey law, punitive damages of up to five times the compensatory damage amount are allowed, according to the woman’s legal team.

Sheri Woodruff, spokeswoman for J&J’s Ethicon Surgical Care subsidiary, noted the jury did not rule against the company on all counts.

The jurors rejected a claim that J&J’s former Prolift vaginal mesh implant was designed defectively. Johnson & Johnson launched Prolift in 2005 and stopped selling it last year amid mounting lawsuits.

“While we are always concerned when a patient experiences medical conditions like those suffered by the plaintiff, all surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse present risks of complications,” Woodruff said in a statement.

Prolapse occurs when a pelvic organ – the bladder, uterus, vagina, bowel or rectum – droops as muscles weaken due to childbirth, aging, obesity or other factors. That can cause painful intercourse, lower backache, constipation or stress incontinence, meaning bladder leakage usually triggered by coughing, sneezing, lifting heav y objects or exercise.

Mesh implants, made of a porous synthetic or biologic material, are implanted and tied to ligaments or bone to serve as a sort of sling to lift and support the organ involved.

Introduced more than a decade ago, they were touted as a safer, easier alternative to hysterectomy or other surgery. Hundreds of thousands of women had them implanted.

Thousands later complained of complications: severe pain, infections and bleeding, generally requiring follow-up surgeries to fix those problems.

The New Jersey jury deliberated for five days, capping a six-week trial before Superior Court Judge Carol E. Higbee. Following the verdict, Higbee heard arguments from attorneys on both sides as to whether a punitive phase was merited. She ruled in favor of the plaintiff late Monday.

Woodruff said Johnson & Johnson plans to present more evidence to the jury during a punitive phase.

About 1,200 of the 4,000 lawsuits alleging harm from J&J’s vaginal mesh implants are pending in New Jersey.

In a statement, Gross called the jury verdict “a resounding victory” for her and tens of thousands of women seeking justice from Prolift’s maker. During the trial, she described her life since getting the vaginal implant as a “living hell.”

The a nationwide support group hears horrific stories on a daily basis. “These women are suffering and deserve justice” Says the helpline medical social worker. The vaginal mesh lawyers agree and are ready to send a message to the manufacturers who are choosing profits over warnings and testing.